| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
grimm26
Guru
Joined: 23 May 2004
Posts: 313
Location: Chicagoland, IL
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:28 pm Post subject: eudev forces persistent net dev names |
 |
|
I decided to try the switch from udev to eudev today but ended up switching back because eudev seems to force persistent net dev names. I seem to be into minority around here (at least judging from the complaints) that has made peace with predictable net dev names. Switching to eudev took that away and screwed me until I manually brought up the interface after reboot and re-installed udev.
I thought predictable net dev names were now the default and you had to opt out. It seems that udev has reversed that, although I couldn't find a way to opt out of persistent net names. It kept generating the persistent net rules file. Is there a way to go predictable net names under udev?
_________________
"Blessed is he who finds happiness in his own foolishness, for he will always be happy". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Doctor
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 2557
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I decided to try the switch from udev to eudev today but ended up switching back because eudev seems to force persistent net dev names. |
Which version did you try? With which use flags? 1.10-r2 behaves correctly for me, although I did see a note somewhere that 9999 follows upstream.
_________________
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
Apologies if I take a while to respond. I'm currently working on the dematerialization circuit for my blue box. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
grimm26
Guru
Joined: 23 May 2004
Posts: 313
Location: Chicagoland, IL
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Doctor wrote: | | Quote: | | I decided to try the switch from udev to eudev today but ended up switching back because eudev seems to force persistent net dev names. |
Which version did you try? With which use flags? 1.10-r2 behaves correctly for me, although I did see a note somewhere that 9999 follows upstream. |
Latest stable: 1.10-r2
USE flags: aha! I think rule-generator is what screwed me.
_________________
"Blessed is he who finds happiness in his own foolishness, for he will always be happy". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Doctor
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 2557
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have no idea why I didn't post this origonally, but mine use flags are USE="gudev hwdb keymap kmod modutils openrc rule-generator"
_________________
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
Apologies if I take a while to respond. I'm currently working on the dematerialization circuit for my blue box. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Kernel & Hardware
