Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
binutils:2.31 amd64 corrupted my 4.14 kernels [solved]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:53 pm    Post subject: binutils:2.31 amd64 corrupted my 4.14 kernels [solved] Reply with quote

I've just recompiled a couple of 4.14 amd64 stable kernels
None of them don't boot anymore, messaging:
Alignment of LOAD segment isn't multiple of 2 MB
-- System halted

Am I the only one?

Thks 4 ur attention.


Last edited by CaptainBlood on Tue Apr 30, 2019 4:52 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5368

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 6:29 pm    Post subject: Re: gcc-8.3.0-r1 corrupted my 4.14 amd64 kernels Reply with quote

CaptainBlood wrote:
I've just recompiled a couple of 4.14 amd64 stable kernels
None of them don't boot anymore, messaging:
Alignment of LOAD segment isn't multiple of 2 MB
-- System halted

Am I the only one?

Thks 4 ur attention.

try defconfig from scratch, see if they boot.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3688
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe a newer elfutils foolished you? elfutils was unstabled again in the mean while.
Don't forget "make clean".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Worked around my masking sys-devel/binutils:2.31,

As a side note, binutils:2.31 forced USE="gold plugins".
May be related.

gcc:8.3 is bind to be gold ready, altough not using it for quite a while now.

'make clean' seems reasonable enough as a first step, defconfig if previous failed.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Duncan Mac Leod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 251
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today I had another problem with binutils 2.31 on amd64.

First I compiled/upgraded to glibc 2.28-r5, then I want to compile binutils, noticing these new gold flags.

During compilation I tried to figure out their meaning. After the successful compilation of binutils 2.31.1-r4 I noticed that binutils is not listed as stable any longer on the package-site https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/binutils, but portage listed them as stable.

So I unmerged 2.31.1-r4 and recompiled 2.30-r4 - so far, so good.

Now, I recompiled gcc 6.4.0-r1, BUT gcc compiling FAILED. Very strange!

So, I decided to set my Gentoo system back before the first emerge of glibc (I am using Gentoo in a VM). Lost 2 hours and I am wondering why these packages went into stable tree?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've not had a problem with binutils-2.31 ... yet. But I didn't do the upgrade to glibc-2.28, I've stayed with glibc-2.27.

as far as the gold flag, binutils 2.30 also set it internally in the ebuild, it just didn't have a USE flag, not sure if plugins was set though.
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neither
Code:
make clean
nor
Code:
make defconfig
solved the issue.
Here's
Code:
sys-libs/glibc-2.28-r5
.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest é support.


Last edited by CaptainBlood on Sun Apr 07, 2019 2:46 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Were there any warning messages when compiling the kernel?
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
Were there any warning messages when compiling the kernel?

No warning at all...

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see this morning they downgraded elfutils, from 0.176 (was stable, now marked ~) back to 0.170-r1. Might have something to do with the problems some of you have had. *shrugs*
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Duncan Mac Leod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 251
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/binutils says that binutils-2.31.1-r4 is unstable, but portage means that it is flagged stable. Curious...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 21782
Location: here

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
I see this morning they downgraded elfutils, from 0.176 (was stable, now marked ~) back to 0.170-r1. Might have something to do with the problems some of you have had. *shrugs*

Related bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/671760
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duncan Mac Leod wrote:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/binutils says that binutils-2.31.1-r4 is unstable, but portage means that it is flagged stable. Curious...


Packages website hasn't been updated properly. Bugs.gentoo and the ebuild itself are what to pay attention to.

2.31.1-r4 is still marked stable for amd64. all other archs are still unstable.
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toralf
Developer
Developer


Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 3688
Location: Hamburg

PostPosted: Sun Apr 07, 2019 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

or an elfutils bug?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/676794
https://bugs.gentoo.org/671760
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 21782
Location: here

PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

toralf wrote:
or an elfutils bug?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/676794
https://bugs.gentoo.org/671760

The real bug is binutils, see upstream bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23919
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
toralf wrote:
or an elfutils bug?

https://bugs.gentoo.org/676794
https://bugs.gentoo.org/671760

The real bug is binutils, see upstream bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23919


That's for binutils 2.32, not sure what all the people above are running. So won't say for sure that that's a problem until they chime in.
The original poster says 2.31 which doesn't have the problem, but he didn't say which elfutils he was using.

But it's some variation of binutils + elfutils that's likely the culprit.

Note: I did look at some of the bugs yesterday and there indeed is a problem when switching back to 2.31 from things compiled/linked with 2.32, as it seems that some internals changed between the 2 versions. No matter which it is, it's a developer caused problem both gentoo and upstream as there seems to be a severe lack of coordination between all parties. Elfutils went from 0.170 to 0.176 and then back to 0.170 in conjunction with the binutils stuff.
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 21782
Location: here

PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anon-E-moose wrote:
That's for binutils 2.32, not sure what all the people above are running. So won't say for sure that that's a problem until they chime in.

I tested the upstream patch in binutils 2.31 with >=dev-libs/elfutils-0.175 and works
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Duncan Mac Leod
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 251
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duncan Mac Leod wrote:
Today I had another problem with binutils 2.31 on amd64.

First I compiled/upgraded to glibc 2.28-r5, then I want to compile binutils, noticing these new gold flags.

During compilation I tried to figure out their meaning. After the successful compilation of binutils 2.31.1-r4 I noticed that binutils is not listed as stable any longer on the package-site https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/binutils, but portage listed them as stable.

So I unmerged 2.31.1-r4 and recompiled 2.30-r4 - so far, so good.

Now, I recompiled gcc 6.4.0-r1, BUT gcc compiling FAILED. Very strange!

So, I decided to set my Gentoo system back before the first emerge of glibc (I am using Gentoo in a VM). Lost 2 hours and I am wondering why these packages went into stable tree?


My mistake :oops: ...

Today I ran into the same error on x86 (re-)compiling gcc 6.4.0-r1, so I decided to upgrade gcc to the latest stable version (8.2.0-r6). No errors on compiling gcc.

The error on gcc 6.4.0-r1 was that the new glibc-2.28 is missing sys/ustat.h, so gcc 6.4.0-r1 is throwing an error nearly at the end of the build process.

Maybe gcc 6.4.0-r1 should check whether it builds against glibc-2.28 and abort.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 13855

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duncan Mac Leod wrote:
The error on gcc 6.4.0-r1 was that the new glibc-2.28 is missing sys/ustat.h, so gcc 6.4.0-r1 is throwing an error nearly at the end of the build process.

Maybe gcc 6.4.0-r1 should check whether it builds against glibc-2.28 and abort.
This is a bug in the ebuild. It should patch gcc to work anyway, or have dependencies that prevent building it with a known incompatible glibc. Aborting the build after it starts is only very slightly better than doing nothing, since it will still be a failure that the user must resolve.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fedeliallalinea wrote:
I tested the upstream patch in binutils 2.31 with >=dev-libs/elfutils-0.175 and works
Would you be keen enough to post a link for patch if any as I haven't found one yet, but indications what to patch and how, which is another story.
Surprisingly current statble 2.31 doesn't seem patched in portage, AFAIK.

Thks 4 ur attention.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fedeliallalinea
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 21782
Location: here

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CaptainBlood wrote:
fedeliallalinea wrote:
I tested the upstream patch in binutils 2.31 with >=dev-libs/elfutils-0.175 and works
Would you be keen enough to post a link for patch if any as I haven't found one yet, but indications what to patch and how, which is another story.
Surprisingly current statble 2.31 doesn't seem patched in portage, AFAIK.

Sure but rember that patch works and tested only in my system without problem for now (patch).
The patch is not applied because the problem is present only with a unstable package (dev-libs/elfutils-0.175).
_________________
Questions are guaranteed in life; Answers aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hum...
Code:
'snipped' eix dev-libs/elfutils
     Installed versions:  0.173-r1(17:57:20 10/04/2019)(-bzip2 -lzma -nls -static-libs -test -threads -utils ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64" ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32")
That kernel alignment issue remains... only with binutils:2.31, unpatched.
Puzzled :oops:

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What version of gcc and glibc.

And is the problem with building the kernel or trying to execute an already built image?
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CaptainBlood
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 1103

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem is with booting a fresh builded kernel.
Code:
emerge --info sys-devel/binutils
Portage 2.3.62 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/amd64/17.0, gcc-8.3.0, glibc-2.28-r6, 4.14.105-gentoo-r1-tuntap x86_64)
=================================================================
                         System Settings
=================================================================
System uname: Linux-4.14.105-gentoo-r1-tuntap-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i3-6100_CPU_@_3.70GHz-with-gentoo-2.6
KiB Mem:     3942400 total,   2399124 free
KiB Swap:    8048528 total,   8048528 free

sh bash 4.4_p23-r1
ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.31.1 p5) 2.31.1
app-shells/bash:          4.4_p23-r1::gentoo
dev-java/java-config:     2.2.0-r4::gentoo
dev-lang/perl:            5.26.2::gentoo
dev-lang/python:          2.7.15::gentoo, 3.6.5::gentoo
dev-util/cmake:           3.9.6::gentoo
dev-util/pkgconfig:       0.29.2::gentoo
sys-apps/baselayout:      2.6-r1::gentoo
sys-apps/openrc:          0.38.3-r1::gentoo
sys-apps/sandbox:         2.13::gentoo
sys-devel/autoconf:       2.13-r1::gentoo, 2.69-r4::gentoo
sys-devel/automake:       1.11.6-r3::gentoo, 1.15.1-r2::gentoo, 1.16.1-r1::gentoo
sys-devel/binutils:       2.30-r4::gentoo, 2.31.1-r4::gentoo
sys-devel/gcc:            8.2.0-r6::gentoo, 8.3.0-r1::gentoo
sys-devel/gcc-config:     2.0::gentoo
sys-devel/libtool:        2.4.6-r3::gentoo
sys-devel/make:           4.2.1-r4::gentoo
sys-kernel/linux-headers: 4.14-r1::gentoo (virtual/os-headers)
sys-libs/glibc:           2.28-r6::gentoo
Repositories:

gentoo
    location: /usr/portage
    sync-type: rsync
    sync-uri: rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
    priority: -1000
    sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest: no
    sync-rsync-extra-opts:
    sync-rsync-verify-jobs: 1
    sync-rsync-verify-max-age: 24

x-portage
    location: /usr/local/portage
    masters: gentoo
    priority: 0

cross-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
    location: /usr/local/portage-cross-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
    masters: gentoo
    priority: 10

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=native -mtune=skylake  -O2             -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/php/apache2-php7.2/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php7.2/ext-active/ /etc/php/cli-php7.2/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/splash /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c"
CXXFLAGS="-march=native -mtune=skylake  -O2             -pipe    "
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="   --alert y          --alphabetical       --ask-enter-invalid          --autounmask y           --autounmask-only n           --autounmask-unrestricted-atoms y     --autounmask-write y          --misspell-suggestions n       --noconfmem          --nospinner            --tree       --with-bdeps y"
ENV_UNSET="DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DISPLAY GOBIN PERL5LIB PERL5OPT PERLPREFIX PERL_CORE PERL_MB_OPT PERL_MM_OPT XAUTHORITY XDG_CACHE_HOME XDG_CONFIG_HOME XDG_DATA_HOME XDG_RUNTIME_DIR"
FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-docompress binpkg-dostrip binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles ipc-sandbox merge-sync multilib-strict network-sandbox news parallel-fetch pid-sandbox preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms split-elog strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync"
FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org"
LANG="fr_FR.utf8"
LDFLAGS="  -Wl,-O1       -Wl,-fuse-ld=bfd  -Wl,--enable-new-dtags  -march=native -mtune=skylake  -O2             -pipe "
LINGUAS="fr"
MAKEOPTS="-j3 -l3"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_COMPRESS="lzma"
PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS="-9"
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --exclude=/.git"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
USE="amd64 asm minimal" ABI_X86="64" ALSA_CARDS="hda-intel" CPU_FLAGS_X86="aes avx avx2 f16c fma3 mmx mmxext pclmul popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3" ELIBC="glibc" GRUB_PLATFORMS="pc" INPUT_DEVICES="libinput" KERNEL="linux" L10N="fr" PHP_TARGETS="php7-2" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_6 python3_7" QEMU_USER_TARGETS="aarch64" RUBY_TARGETS="ruby24" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="intel i965"
Unset:  CC, CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, CXX, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, PORTAGE_BINHOST, PORTAGE_BUNZIP2_COMMAND, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

=================================================================
                        Package Settings
=================================================================

sys-devel/binutils-2.30-r4::gentoo was built with the following:
USE="cxx -doc -multitarget -nls -static-libs -test" ABI_X86="(64)"


sys-devel/binutils-2.31.1-r4::gentoo was built with the following:
USE="cxx -default-gold -doc gold -multitarget -nls plugins -static-libs -test" ABI_X86="(64)"
Also tried with patched binutils:2.31
Code:
mkdir -p /etc/portage/patches/sys-devel/binutils-2.31.1-r4
nano -w /etc/portage/patches/sys-devel/binutils-2.31.1-r4/binutils-2.31.1-r4-elf-compressed-data-alignment.patch
where I pasted lines 58 to 518 both inclusive from fedeliallalinea's above patch, then
Code:
emerge -1 =sys-devel/binutils-2.31.1-r4
eselect binutils x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.31.1
. /etc/profile
starting with
Code:
make clean
before rebuilding kernel.
But alignment issue remains.

Thks 4 ur attention, interest & support.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anon-E-moose
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 3954
Location: Dallas area

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Code:
LDFLAGS="  -Wl,-O1       -Wl,-fuse-ld=bfd  -Wl,--enable-new-dtags  -march=native -mtune=skylake  -O2             -pipe "


:?:


Code:
       --enable-new-dtags
       --disable-new-dtags
           This linker can create the new dynamic tags in ELF. But the older ELF systems may not understand them. If
           you specify --enable-new-dtags, the new dynamic tags will be created as needed and older dynamic tags will
           be omitted.  If you specify --disable-new-dtags, no new dynamic tags will be created. By default, the new
           dynamic tags are not created. Note that those options are only available for ELF systems.


I would not set LDFLAGS in your make.conf (which is where some of the stuff is coming from and let the default take place)
Default is [LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed"]

Edit to add: I don't know if the above is part of the problem, but simplifying things is always a good first step.
_________________
Asus m5a99fx, FX 8320 - nouveau, oss4, rx550 for qemu passthrough
Acer laptop E5-575, i3-7100u - i965, alsa
---both---
5.0.13 zen kernel, profile 17.0 (no-pie) amd64-no-multilib
gcc 8.2.0, eudev, openrc, openbox, palemoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum