Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Official thread: "zen-sources" - Part 8
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cyberdemon
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a pool!!
I forgot that VMware is using Fusion MPT driver..
I got the right module name by running lspci -v for Fusion MPT,
I'm recompiling a kernel now.

Thanks for your help, KernelOfTruth!! :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyberdemon
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Compiling done, running so flawlessly..!
Thanks again! What a pool I'm... :oops:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mantoo
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 98
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saundersx wrote:
One thing I have noticed since upgrading to 2.6.31-zen2

hedgehog / $ modprobe it87
FATAL: Error inserting it87 (/lib/modules/2.6.31-zen2/kernel/drivers/hwmon/it87.ko): Device or resource busy

Anyone else having this?


ok, back again

1st workaround:
Code:
pnpacpi=off
as kernelparameter, which i found here

2nd, and maybe better workaround:
Code:
acpi_enforce_resources=no
as kernel parameter, as suggested here

even switching to atk0110 as sensordriver was suggested. dont know which one of the approaches fits best, as i couldn´t test´em.

~~~~~~~~~
edit:
and some additional related stuff talking abount lm_sensors and patches/ebuilds here

~~~~~~~~~
my mobo is a asus p5v2d-mx btw

~~~~~~~~~
edit2:
and
Code:
acpi_enforce_resources=lax
should work too

~~~~~~~~~
3rd and last edit:

one more time i should´ve trust a bit more in this powerful forum, as the problem is handled in that thread... :oops:


Last edited by mantoo on Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:16 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 7112
Location: Austria

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheater1034 wrote:
should be fixed now anyway ;)

please confirm (im waiting on someone else's confirmation too)

confirmed, works again!
_________________
backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those with 2.6.32 bfs problems, try now please :D
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saundersx
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 251

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mantoo wrote:
Saundersx wrote:
One thing I have noticed since upgrading to 2.6.31-zen2

hedgehog / $ modprobe it87
FATAL: Error inserting it87 (/lib/modules/2.6.31-zen2/kernel/drivers/hwmon/it87.ko): Device or resource busy

Anyone else having this?


ok, back again

1st workaround:
Code:
pnpacpi=off
as kernelparameter, which i found here

2nd, and maybe better workaround:
Code:
acpi_enforce_resources=no
as kernel parameter, as suggested here

even switching to atk0110 as sensordriver was suggested. dont know which one of the approaches fits best, as i couldn´t test´em.

~~~~~~~~~
edit:
and some additional related stuff talking abount lm_sensors and patches/ebuilds here

~~~~~~~~~
my mobo is a asus p5v2d-mx btw

~~~~~~~~~
edit2:
and
Code:
acpi_enforce_resources=lax
should work too

~~~~~~~~~
3rd and last edit:

one more time i should´ve trust a bit more in this powerful forum, as the problem is handled in that thread... :oops:


I did some reading as well. Now using "acpi_enforce_resources=lax" and it seems to work fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey guys, bunch of great new things :D

1. BFQ is the default i/o scheduler in ALL the trees (2.6.30/2.6.31, unstable)
- Test it, fabio is interested in both bug reports and any benchmarks/results!!!!! so give them to me and i can forward them
2. new 2.6.31 patch released in the past few days (new one will follow shortly due to alsa and drm fixes in git)
3. new 2.6.30 patch released (includes bfs 303 and 2.6.30.9)
4. new 2.6.32-rc3-zen1 patch released (YES! it's very solid and builds with the allmodconfig A OK, reiser4 is broken however)

BFS/BFQ make zen more geared for desktop usage than ever before!

Plus, now is the time to try zen if you haven't, it's growing in popularity - a few devs want their patches in to get tested and forwarded results/bug reports - so do it! I know people use it on several distributions now (varying from momongo to sourcemage to arch to debian to fedora to ubuntu to sidux to gentoo to exherbo to yoper) - quite impressive!
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey guys, PLEASE vouch for zen on bugs.gentoo.org for inclusion into portage:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288512

I'm sure the more interest it shows the more likely it will get into gentoo (which many people would want, because they would get ebuilds again)
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tranquilcool
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1160

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LD .tmp_vmlinux1
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x14db): undefined reference to `__schedule'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x16d6): undefined reference to `__schedule'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_killable_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x1842): undefined reference to `__schedule'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

latest zen 2.6.30-zen6 with bfs/bfq checkout errors.
help please.
_________________
this is a strange strange world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rahulthewall
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 1264
Location: Zürich

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheater1034 wrote:
Hey guys, PLEASE vouch for zen on bugs.gentoo.org for inclusion into portage:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288512

I'm sure the more interest it shows the more likely it will get into gentoo (which many people would want, because they would get ebuilds again)


In the bug you mention that you are looking at including TuxOnIce back in to zen-sources. Is that true?
_________________
Who shall guard the guards?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 5879

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Will compcache ever work with BFS?

If not I might just go out and buy two extra RAM sticks instead :roll:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ponciarello
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 223
Location: beach of slack

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it works :)

http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/CompilingAndUsingNew

you need to download and compile code to get rzscontrol binary for activating swap before mounting that. load module (by default it creates /dev/ramzsawp0) then
Code:
rzscontrol /dev/ramzswap0 --init
swapon -p 1 /dev/ramzswap0


;)
_________________
look for monty python channel on youtube :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DigitalCorpus
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheater1034 wrote:
Hey guys, bunch of great new things :D

1. BFQ is the default i/o scheduler in ALL the trees (2.6.30/2.6.31, unstable)
- Test it, fabio is interested in both bug reports and any benchmarks/results!!!!! so give them to me and i can forward them
2. new 2.6.31 patch released in the past few days (new one will follow shortly due to alsa and drm fixes in git)
3. new 2.6.30 patch released (includes bfs 303 and 2.6.30.9)
4. new 2.6.32-rc3-zen1 patch released (YES! it's very solid and builds with the allmodconfig A OK, reiser4 is broken however)

BFS/BFQ make zen more geared for desktop usage than ever before!

Plus, now is the time to try zen if you haven't, it's growing in popularity - a few devs want their patches in to get tested and forwarded results/bug reports - so do it! I know people use it on several distributions now (varying from momongo to sourcemage to arch to debian to fedora to ubuntu to sidux to gentoo to exherbo to yoper) - quite impressive!

Ahhh man! Reiser4 is broken? GRRRR! I have the Btrfs guys telling me to bump to 2.6.32 and that zen-sources has the latest btrfs pulled from git. I'm looking to test how the little panic once disk is 90% full works out, but my root is on R4 :(. cheater1034, could you please post when this gets fixed? I'm extremely anxious....

Okay so I just updated zen-stable and I see
Code:
 * [new branch]      btrfs      -> origin/btrfs

What version or git pull is this of btrfs?
_________________
Atlas (HDTV PVR, HTTP & Media server)
http://atlas.selfip.net/Info/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigitalCorpus wrote:
cheater1034 wrote:
Hey guys, bunch of great new things :D

1. BFQ is the default i/o scheduler in ALL the trees (2.6.30/2.6.31, unstable)
- Test it, fabio is interested in both bug reports and any benchmarks/results!!!!! so give them to me and i can forward them
2. new 2.6.31 patch released in the past few days (new one will follow shortly due to alsa and drm fixes in git)
3. new 2.6.30 patch released (includes bfs 303 and 2.6.30.9)
4. new 2.6.32-rc3-zen1 patch released (YES! it's very solid and builds with the allmodconfig A OK, reiser4 is broken however)

BFS/BFQ make zen more geared for desktop usage than ever before!

Plus, now is the time to try zen if you haven't, it's growing in popularity - a few devs want their patches in to get tested and forwarded results/bug reports - so do it! I know people use it on several distributions now (varying from momongo to sourcemage to arch to debian to fedora to ubuntu to sidux to gentoo to exherbo to yoper) - quite impressive!

Ahhh man! Reiser4 is broken? GRRRR! I have the Btrfs guys telling me to bump to 2.6.32 and that zen-sources has the latest btrfs pulled from git. I'm looking to test how the little panic once disk is 90% full works out, but my root is on R4 :(. cheater1034, could you please post when this gets fixed? I'm extremely anxious....

Okay so I just updated zen-stable and I see
Code:
 * [new branch]      btrfs      -> origin/btrfs

What version or git pull is this of btrfs?


DigitalCorpus try to revert reiser4 from mmotm and replace it with the one from 2.6.31 (it worked at least with 2.6.31-zen2 for me - I manually removed it :oops: )
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nero37
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 141
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tranquilcool wrote:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x14db): undefined reference to `__schedule'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x16d6): undefined reference to `__schedule'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `__mutex_lock_killable_slowpath':
mutex.c:(.sched.text+0x1842): undefined reference to `__schedule'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

latest zen 2.6.30-zen6 with bfs/bfq checkout errors.


I'm seeing this too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheater1034 wrote:
Hey guys, PLEASE vouch for zen on bugs.gentoo.org for inclusion into portage:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288512

I'm sure the more interest it shows the more likely it will get into gentoo (which many people would want, because they would get ebuilds again)

+1

Latest PTS test results 2.6.32-rc3-zen2+BFS/BFQ
http://global.phoronix-test-suite.com/index.php?k=profile&u=zero-10357-3788-24286

Ant_P wrote:
Will compcache ever work with BFS?

If not I might just go out and buy two extra RAM sticks instead :roll:

Am using a 2Gb ramdisk for portage temp and ccache and i must say it makes
a HUGE difference as seen in this before and after.
Code:

vger ~ # genlop -t glibc
 * sys-libs/glibc

     Tue Sep 22 15:35:07 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 1 hour, 58 minutes and 26 seconds.

     Tue Sep 22 18:15:39 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 7 minutes and 39 seconds.

_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jupiter1TX wrote:

Am using a 2Gb ramdisk for portage temp and ccache and i must say it makes
a HUGE difference as seen in this before and after.
Code:

vger ~ # genlop -t glibc
 * sys-libs/glibc

     Tue Sep 22 15:35:07 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 1 hour, 58 minutes and 26 seconds.

     Tue Sep 22 18:15:39 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 7 minutes and 39 seconds.


you most be doing something wrong:

Quote:
Mon May 18 20:16:19 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 32 minutes and 50 seconds.

Mon Aug 10 12:52:50 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 23 minutes and 8 seconds.

Mon Aug 10 14:10:42 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 25 minutes and 20 seconds.


without ccache and tmpfs only on and E6600 (Core2Duo @stock clock, 2.4 GHz)

try to raise MAKEOPTS at least to -j5 that should make it even faster :idea:
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
Jupiter1TX wrote:

Am using a 2Gb ramdisk for portage temp and ccache and i must say it makes
a HUGE difference as seen in this before and after.
Code:

vger ~ # genlop -t glibc
 * sys-libs/glibc

     Tue Sep 22 15:35:07 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 1 hour, 58 minutes and 26 seconds.

     Tue Sep 22 18:15:39 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
       merge time: 7 minutes and 39 seconds.


you most be doing something wrong:

Quote:
Mon May 18 20:16:19 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 32 minutes and 50 seconds.

Mon Aug 10 12:52:50 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 23 minutes and 8 seconds.

Mon Aug 10 14:10:42 2009 >>> sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1
merge time: 25 minutes and 20 seconds.


without ccache and tmpfs only on and E6600 (Core2Duo @stock clock, 2.4 GHz)

try to raise MAKEOPTS at least to -j5 that should make it even faster :idea:


Am using -j8. In the first emerge i was booted from the NEO cd.
I agree with you though it took to long. It would be nice to know
what i am doing wrong. If anyone can suggest better CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
settings for Core i7 920 please do. Here is what i am using now.
Code:
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -msse4 -pipe"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed"

_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DigitalCorpus
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much RAM do you have?
What filesystem is /usr/portage residing?
What is your root filesystem?
What I/O scheduler do you use?

-msse4 should be implied by -march=native
Your LDFLAGS and CFLAGS are sane.
_________________
Atlas (HDTV PVR, HTTP & Media server)
http://atlas.selfip.net/Info/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigitalCorpus wrote:
How much RAM do you have?
What filesystem is /usr/portage residing?
What is your root filesystem?
What I/O scheduler do you use?

-msse4 should be implied by -march=native
Your LDFLAGS and CFLAGS are sane.


6Gb of ram
/usr/portage and / are ext4
linux-2.6.32-zen2-BFS+BFQ

This pc is just for fun/performance. Thanks...
_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DigitalCorpus
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what are the outputs of
Code:
hdparm -t /dev/hd* or sd*

for each or your hard drives?
_________________
Atlas (HDTV PVR, HTTP & Media server)
http://atlas.selfip.net/Info/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigitalCorpus wrote:
what are the outputs of
Code:
hdparm -t /dev/hd* or sd*

for each or your hard drives?

heh, yea not very fast
Code:
vger ~ # hdparm -t /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  226 MB in  3.02 seconds =  74.72 MB/sec

_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DigitalCorpus
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those are the basic for what will slow you down. Unless Ext4 suffers major degradation from fragmentation, I'm not sure why you have that much of a slow down. Try one more thing for me please:
Code:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
time emerge -pev @system @world

On a Reiser4 partition I get about 16 seconds
_________________
Atlas (HDTV PVR, HTTP & Media server)
http://atlas.selfip.net/Info/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jupiter1TX
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigitalCorpus wrote:
Those are the basic for what will slow you down. Unless Ext4 suffers major degradation from fragmentation, I'm not sure why you have that much of a slow down. Try one more thing for me please:
Code:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
time emerge -pev @system @world

On a Reiser4 partition I get about 16 seconds


Total: 893 packages (7 upgrades, 2 downgrades, 884 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 1,155,829 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
[0] /usr/portage
[1] /usr/portage/local/layman/redspot
[2] /usr/portage/local/layman/desktop-effects

real 0m49.875s
user 0m11.446s
sys 0m0.224s

UPDATE:
After taking care of the '7 upgrades, 2 downgrades'
Code:
Total: 893 packages (893 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 1,140,966 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
 [0] /usr/portage
 [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/redspot
 [2] /usr/portage/local/layman/desktop-effects

real    0m11.388s
user    0m11.128s
sys     0m0.127s

_________________
Core i7 920 D0 | Asus P6T DLX | Patriot Viper 1600 6GB | Antec Quattro 850W
Geforce 8800GTX OC2 768MB | Dell 22" LCD | Koolance Exos2/Swiftech GTZ
GCC 4.6.1 | 3.7.x-geek | Xorg-7.4-x | KDE-4.7.x | Compiz


Last edited by Jupiter1TX on Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DigitalCorpus
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see anythign that would indicate that slow down you mentioned. You did say that time was when you booted to a CD instead of off your hard disk. If you compile glibc now, do you still get fairly lengthy times?
_________________
Atlas (HDTV PVR, HTTP & Media server)
http://atlas.selfip.net/Info/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 5 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum