Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Zen Kernel Discussion/Support Thread - Part 3
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ant P.
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 5733

PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's some new radeon power management/sensors support patches here. Any chance we can play with them before 2.6.35?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

could one of you guys please *BUMP* the zen-upstream to 2.6.34-rc2 ?

thanks !
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpectreDragon
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 92
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After my last update (zen.stable) I noticed some strange behavior in my available disk space using btrfs. It looks like there are several Gb (about 5-20) lost 8O

df says
Code:
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs                 30G   14G   11G  56% /
/dev/mapper/home       97G   60G   20G  76% /home

So the used and free space is not even near the size. Doesn't seem quite normal, anyone else who has noticed something similar? Will try to format those partitions and see if this is a temporary issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SpectreDragon wrote:
After my last update (zen.stable) I noticed some strange behavior in my available disk space using btrfs. It looks like there are several Gb (about 5-20) lost 8O

df says
Code:
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs                 30G   14G   11G  56% /
/dev/mapper/home       97G   60G   20G  76% /home

So the used and free space is not even near the size. Doesn't seem quite normal, anyone else who has noticed something similar? Will try to format those partitions and see if this is a temporary issue.


what does
Quote:
du -hs /
say after unmounting the other partitions ?
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpectreDragon
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 92
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
SpectreDragon wrote:
After my last update (zen.stable) I noticed some strange behavior in my available disk space using btrfs. It looks like there are several Gb (about 5-20) lost 8O

df says
Code:
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs                 30G   14G   11G  56% /
/dev/mapper/home       97G   60G   20G  76% /home

So the used and free space is not even near the size. Doesn't seem quite normal, anyone else who has noticed something similar? Will try to format those partitions and see if this is a temporary issue.


what does
Quote:
du -hs /
say after unmounting the other partitions ?

wasn't able to unmount every partition while using the system but /home and /usr/portage which gives me
Code:
rootfs                 30G   14G   11G  56% /
/dev/mapper/root       30G   14G   11G  56% /
rc-svcdir             1.0M   88K  936K   9% /lib64/rc/init.d
udev                   10M  288K  9.8M   3% /dev
shm                   2.0G  412K  2.0G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                 1.0G   16K  1.0G   1% /tmp

this should not distort the result too much.

du -hs / gives about 20 Gb.. so df could / may be wrong?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SpectreDragon wrote:


du -hs / gives about 20 Gb.. so df could / may be wrong?


sure,

this was the purpose of this demonstration ;)

I read in several sources (among them the reiserfs mailing list & reiser4 w. compression) that df gives pretty inaccurate results - so du -hs
is your friend :idea:
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpectreDragon
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 92
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth wrote:
SpectreDragon wrote:


du -hs / gives about 20 Gb.. so df could / may be wrong?


sure,

this was the purpose of this demonstration ;)

I read in several sources (among them the reiserfs mailing list & reiser4 w. compression) that df gives pretty inaccurate results - so du -hs
is your friend :idea:

thanks for the hint :)
[being away freeing disk space :lol: ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I have some time later I'll push 2.6.34-rc2-zen1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

v2.6.34-rc2-zen1 pushed (and reiser4 fixed).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tranquilcool
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1159

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
v2.6.34-rc2-zen1 pushed (and reiser4 fixed).


debug latest pull;


1).config:294:warning: symbol value 'X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' invalid for X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES

2)CC lib/decompress_unlzo.o
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:53: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘parse_header’
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:90: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘unlzo’
make[1]: *** [lib/decompress_unlzo.o] Error 1
make: *** [lib] Error 2
_________________
this is a strange strange world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rion
Guru
Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 376
Location: Ekaterinburg, Russia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_enter':
kernel/softirq.c:280: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_enter'
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_exit':
kernel/softirq.c:305: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_exit'
make[1]: *** [kernel/softirq.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error
_________________
~amd64
rion-overlay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rufnut
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 203

PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rion wrote:
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_enter':
kernel/softirq.c:280: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_enter'
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_exit':
kernel/softirq.c:305: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_exit'
make[1]: *** [kernel/softirq.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error


Yes me too :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6108
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
v2.6.34-rc2-zen1 pushed (and reiser4 fixed).


thanks Waninkoko !

rufnut wrote:
Rion wrote:
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_enter':
kernel/softirq.c:280: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_enter'
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_exit':
kernel/softirq.c:305: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_exit'
make[1]: *** [kernel/softirq.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error


Yes me too :(


unfortunately it also fails for me at these parts

it's a problem independent of CFS or BFS, the exact same code-sections seem to exist also with 2.6.33-zen2

strange :?
_________________
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/ZFS-for-SystemRescueCD/tree/ZFS-for-SysRescCD-4.9.0
https://github.com/kernelOfTruth/pulseaudio-equalizer-ladspa

Hardcore Gentoo Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cach0rr0
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 13 Nov 2008
Posts: 4123
Location: Houston, Republic of Texas

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Getting a screwy one trying to rmmod ath9k (Atheros N PCI wireless - on an AR928x )

Why am I doing that in the first place? Well I've had issues with ath9k for a long while; it disconnects when it's under any kind of heavy load. Well, even stranger really, it still shows me associated and whatnot, but normally when I `mtr` every hop shows. When this behaviour happens, I can't access any websites and whatnot, yet, mtr shows all but one or two hops - so if I mtr to say, 4.2.2.2, which has 14 hops for me, maybe hops 7 and 11 don't show.

Strangely enough, 4.2.2.2 will show, just not one or two hops, which instead show question marks. Even though I get data from the destination, those two hops (not 7 and 11 specifically, just one or two hops at random) stop giving me anything, and I can't browse. I've suspected that under load maybe the MTU becomes something out of range, and certain routers just drop it or something.

Weird behaviour that I probably described poorly. ANYWAY, to get around this in the past, I've always /etc/init.d/wicd stop; sleep 2; rmmod ath9k; sleep 5; modprobe -v ath9k; /etc/init.d/wicd start

And bam, all works again. However now when I rmmod ath9k I get a segfault. I try again, get the 'device or resource busy' - no way to fix it except to reboot.

I highly suspect because of all of the other ath9k issues, this may well not be related to zen at all. The only reason I bring it up here is because it's now broken in a slightly different way, so...yeah. Rather, the original issue with the disconnect under load is one I don't think is at all related to zen, because it happened under gentoo-sources from 2.6.30 on to the last gentoo-sources build I tried, 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 (which sucked hard, btw). The issue with being unable to rmmod it may have something to do with zen, so just checking.

I built this kernel with:

Code:

# zgrep FRAME_POINTER /proc/config.gz
CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER=y
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS=y
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y




The relevant dmesg inclusive of trace is as such

Code:

[20588.747226] ath9k 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
[20588.747285] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[20588.747290] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:0c/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT0/charge_full
[20588.747294] CPU 0
[20588.747299] Pid: 17096, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.33-zen2 #14 Aspire 4736Z    /Aspire 4736Z
[20588.747302] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004df4c>]  [<ffffffffa004df4c>] ath9k_hw_detach+0xc/0x50 [ath9k_hw]
[20588.747320] RSP: 0018:ffff8800ba167d48  EFLAGS: 00010296
[20588.747322] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: 0000000000000000
[20588.747325] RDX: 0000000000000400 RSI: ffff8800bb401300 RDI: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
[20588.747327] RBP: ffff8800ba167d58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8800b8c3ab48
[20588.747329] R10: ffffffff816c2fbc R11: 00000000000000a0 R12: ffff8800b8ec0000
[20588.747331] R13: ffff8800bb6a20e8 R14: ffffffffa00d0cc8 R15: 0000000000000001
[20588.747334] FS:  00007f50e5b56700(0000) GS:ffff880001a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[20588.747337] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[20588.747339] CR2: 00007faed43c34f8 CR3: 00000000b9785000 CR4: 00000000000406f0
[20588.747341] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[20588.747343] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[20588.747346] Process rmmod (pid: 17096, threadinfo ffff8800ba166000, task ffff880083428000)
[20588.747348] Stack:
[20588.747349]  ffff8800ba167d58 ffff8800b8e01100 ffff8800ba167d78 ffffffffa00c50fd
[20588.747353] <0> ffff8800ba167d78 ffff8800b8e01100 ffff8800ba167d98 ffffffffa00c5d47
[20588.747357] <0> ffff8800bb6a2088 ffff8800bb6a2000 ffff8800ba167da8 ffffffffa00cd9fc
[20588.747362] Call Trace:
[20588.747373]  [<ffffffffa00c50fd>] ath9k_uninit_hw+0x1d/0x40 [ath9k]
[20588.747378]  [<ffffffffa00c5d47>] ath_cleanup+0x57/0x70 [ath9k]
[20588.747384]  [<ffffffffa00cd9fc>] ath_pci_remove+0x1c/0x20 [ath9k]
[20588.747391]  [<ffffffff812ff212>] pci_device_remove+0x32/0x60
[20588.747396]  [<ffffffff813c79f3>] __device_release_driver+0x53/0xb0
[20588.747399]  [<ffffffff813c7b10>] driver_detach+0xc0/0xd0
[20588.747403]  [<ffffffff813c6af5>] bus_remove_driver+0x85/0xe0
[20588.747406]  [<ffffffff813c80da>] driver_unregister+0x5a/0x90
[20588.747410]  [<ffffffff812ff4cf>] pci_unregister_driver+0x3f/0xc0
[20588.747415]  [<ffffffffa00cd8a0>] ath_pci_exit+0x10/0x20 [ath9k]
[20588.747420]  [<ffffffffa00cdf39>] ath9k_exit+0x9/0x25 [ath9k]
[20588.747429]  [<ffffffff81064fc6>] sys_delete_module+0x186/0x260
[20588.747434]  [<ffffffff81052a59>] ? up_read+0x9/0x10
[20588.747440]  [<ffffffff81548a3b>] ? do_page_fault+0x13b/0x3f0
[20588.747448]  [<ffffffff810024ab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[20588.747450] Code: 52 ff ff ff 41 6b f7 28 e9 78 ff ff ff 41 6b f7 16 e9 6f ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 <83> 7f 24 01 76 1b 83 bf 00 01 00 00 14 74 05 e8 f0 dd 00 00 be
[20588.747481] RIP  [<ffffffffa004df4c>] ath9k_hw_detach+0xc/0x50 [ath9k_hw]
[20588.747491]  RSP <ffff8800ba167d48>
[20588.747494] ---[ end trace 5620c092ba78a69c ]---


Not critical for me, just wondering. If it's of any use, the entire kernel .config is here - http://pastebin.com/hSKKr0kH

Note that I've used this same .config across a number of different builds, started for me in 2.6.33-zen0

Thanks in advance for any input

(PS: if anyone finds the above dmesg output to be too long for their liking, let me know and I'll dump it onto pastebin in the interest of tidying up)
_________________
Lost configuring your system?
dump lspci -n here | see Pappy's guide | Link Stash
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Holysword
l33t
l33t


Joined: 19 Nov 2006
Posts: 946
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have this while trying to emerge linux-uvc:

Code:
perjanus Lago # emerge linux-uvc

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N    ] media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250  0 kB

Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 0 kB

>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250
>>> Failed to emerge media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250, Log file:
>>>  '/var/log/portage/media-video:linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250:20100327-091227.log'
>>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 failed                 Load avg: 1.75, 1.15, 0.64
 * CPV:  media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250
 * REPO: gentoo
 * USE:  amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib userland_GNU
 * Determining the location of the kernel source code
 * Found kernel source directory:
 *     /usr/src/linux
 * Found kernel object directory:
 *     /lib/modules/2.6.33-zen2/build
 * Found sources for kernel version:
 *     2.6.33-zen2
 * Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...                  [ ok ]
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work
>>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work
>>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250 ...
ln: creating symbolic link `Module.symvers': File exists
 * Preparing uvcvideo module
make -j12 -l20 HOSTCC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS= KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux
Building USB Video Class driver...
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/zen-stable'
make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1.  Add `+' to parent make rule.
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_driver.o
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_driver.c: In function ‘uvc_register_video’:
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_driver.c:1472: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_queue.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.o
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c: In function ‘uvc_v4l2_do_ioctl’:
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:989: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘v4l_compat_translate_ioctl’ from incompatible pointer type
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:989: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘v4l_compat_translate_ioctl’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:989: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘v4l_compat_translate_ioctl’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:989: error: too many arguments to function ‘v4l_compat_translate_ioctl’
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c: In function ‘uvc_v4l2_ioctl’:
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:1002: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘video_usercopy’ from incompatible pointer type
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:1002: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘video_usercopy’ makes integer from pointer without a cast
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:1002: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘video_usercopy’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:1002: error: too many arguments to function ‘video_usercopy’
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c: At top level:
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.c:1102: error: ‘v4l_compat_ioctl32’ undeclared here (not in a function)
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/uvc_v4l2.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zen-stable'
make: *** [uvcvideo] Error 2
 * ERROR: media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250 failed:
 *   Unable to emake HOSTCC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS=  KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux 
 *
 * Call stack:
 *     ebuild.sh, line   48:  Called src_compile
 *   environment, line 3568:  Called linux-mod_src_compile
 *   environment, line 2770:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *               eval "emake HOSTCC=\"$(tc-getBUILD_CC)\"                                               CROSS_COMPILE=${CHOST}-                                                 LDFLAGS=\"$(get_abi_LDFLAGS)\"                 ${BUILD_FIXES}                                           ${BUILD_PARAMS}                                        ${BUILD_TARGETS} " || die "Unable to emake HOSTCC="$(tc-getBUILD_CC)" CROSS_COMPILE=${CHOST}- LDFLAGS="$(get_abi_LDFLAGS)" ${BUILD_FIXES} ${BUILD_PARAMS} ${BUILD_TARGETS}";
 *
 * If you need support, post the output of 'emerge --info =media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250',
 * the complete build log and the output of 'emerge -pqv =media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250'.
 * The complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/media-video:linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250:20100327-091227.log'.
 * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/temp/environment'.
 * S: '/var/tmp/portage/media-video/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250/work/linux-uvc-0.1.0_pre250'


Does it mean that linux-uvc is not supported in 2.6.33-zen2?
_________________
"Nolite arbitrari quia venerim mittere pacem in terram non veni pacem mittere sed gladium" (Yeshua Ha Mashiach)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rufnut wrote:
Rion wrote:
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_enter':
kernel/softirq.c:280: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_enter'
kernel/softirq.c: In function 'irq_exit':
kernel/softirq.c:305: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_irq_exit'
make[1]: *** [kernel/softirq.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error


Yes me too :(


config?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rion
Guru
Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 376
Location: Ekaterinburg, Russia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
config?
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/194491/
_________________
~amd64
rion-overlay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It should be fixed now ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tranquilcool
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1159

PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CC lib/decompress_unlzo.o
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:53: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘parse_header’
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:90: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘unlzo’
make[1]: *** [lib/decompress_unlzo.o] Error 1
make: *** [lib] Error 2


got as far as here with latest pull.
_________________
this is a strange strange world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codestation
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 126
Location: /dev/negi

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tranquilcool wrote:
CC lib/decompress_unlzo.o
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:53: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘parse_header’
lib/decompress_unlzo.c:90: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘unlzo’
make[1]: *** [lib/decompress_unlzo.o] Error 1
make: *** [lib] Error 2


got as far as here with latest pull.


Same here, but i managed to compile it using this:
Code:
--- lib/decompress_unlzo.c.orig 2010-03-27 20:18:53.383036122 -0430
+++ lib/decompress_unlzo.c      2010-03-27 20:18:40.790571895 -0430
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/lzo.h>
+#include <linux/decompress/inflate_mm.h>
 #include <linux/decompress/mm.h>
 
 #include <linux/compiler.h>


Reading the commit logs, looks like the latest squashfs commits were the cause of that problem.

P.D.: i had to disable CONFIG_BRIDGE_IGMP_SNOOPING, else i had this error in the end of the compilation:
Code:

  CC      init/version.o
  LD      init/built-in.o
  LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
net/built-in.o: In function `br_multicast_stop':
(.text+0xb60c8): undefined reference to `rcu_barrier_bh'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

Looks like the rcu_* things arent completly fixed.
_________________
Just feel the code...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
savalas
n00b
n00b


Joined: 10 Dec 2009
Posts: 40

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is that just me or AUFS isn't in the latest unstable? I've just compiled/rebooted and my AUFS mounts are nowhere to be found and I can't find AUFS in the menuconfig anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Waninkoko
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

codestation wrote:
...


Are you using classic/preempt RCU? (not tree RCU) They are just experimental ports.


About AUFS... I'm having problems to get the latest AUFS tree so I couldn't merge it yet :/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
savalas
n00b
n00b


Joined: 10 Dec 2009
Posts: 40

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, ok. Thanks for the clarification, I'll just keep an eye on Zen's RSS feed for AUFS updates ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
codestation
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 126
Location: /dev/negi

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Waninkoko wrote:
codestation wrote:
...


Are you using classic/preempt RCU? (not tree RCU) They are just experimental ports.


About AUFS... I'm having problems to get the latest AUFS tree so I couldn't merge it yet :/


The classic is experimental too? Anyway i had switched to that when the fisrt rcu_* compile failures appeared and i forgot to switch back to tree RCU. So now it compiles fine with the option that i had disabled before. Thx for pointing me that.

Waiting for the AUFS too :P (i cant sync my portage tree without it ._. ).
_________________
Just feel the code...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
niick
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 88

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whenever I try to pull or clone zen.git I get this error:

fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

I can pull from other repositories just fine. Anyone else having this issue?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 5 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum